<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Julie Blogs: On writers, writing, and blogging well</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tatumweb.com/blog/2007/03/31/why-julie-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tatumweb.com/blog/2007/03/31/why-julie-blogs/</link>
	<description>Pentecostal Rumination and Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:34:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://tatumweb.com/blog/2007/03/31/why-julie-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-64507</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatumweb.com/blog/2007/03/31/why-julie-blogs/#comment-64507</guid>
		<description>Yes, Keith, I am the ominously secret force behind many of today&#039;s best sellers. I&#039;m not really unemployed, just contractually obligated to pretend to be.

:: grin ::

I noticed my writerly gaffe after I had written it. I suppose I should hyphenate it to &quot;writing-books&quot; or use the more stodgy &quot;books on writing,&quot; but I kind of like the double-take it requires.

Of course, that&#039;s mere rationalization for bad writing. But, I have to leave it like it is, now, thanks to your erudition because, otherwise, your comment will no longer make sense.

:: mock put-upon sigh, mixed with a gallic shrug :: 

Thanks.

Rich
&lt;a href=&quot;http://tatumweb.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;BlogRodent&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Keith, I am the ominously secret force behind many of today&#8217;s best sellers. I&#8217;m not really unemployed, just contractually obligated to pretend to be.</p>
<p>:: grin ::</p>
<p>I noticed my writerly gaffe after I had written it. I suppose I should hyphenate it to &#8220;writing-books&#8221; or use the more stodgy &#8220;books on writing,&#8221; but I kind of like the double-take it requires.</p>
<p>Of course, that&#8217;s mere rationalization for bad writing. But, I have to leave it like it is, now, thanks to your erudition because, otherwise, your comment will no longer make sense.</p>
<p>:: mock put-upon sigh, mixed with a gallic shrug :: </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Rich<br />
<a href="http://tatumweb.com/blog/" rel="tag">BlogRodent</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Schooley</title>
		<link>http://tatumweb.com/blog/2007/03/31/why-julie-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-64499</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Schooley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 03:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatumweb.com/blog/2007/03/31/why-julie-blogs/#comment-64499</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, Rich. I like Julie, and reread myself, as well.

In your first paragraph, you write, &quot;That’s why I enjoy writing books like Stephen King’s memoir on writing...&quot; I&#039;m guessing that you either meant that you like &lt;i&gt;reading&lt;/i&gt; books like that, or you&#039;re breaking some contractual agreements for ghostwriting.

God bless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, Rich. I like Julie, and reread myself, as well.</p>
<p>In your first paragraph, you write, &#8220;That’s why I enjoy writing books like Stephen King’s memoir on writing&#8230;&#8221; I&#8217;m guessing that you either meant that you like <i>reading</i> books like that, or you&#8217;re breaking some contractual agreements for ghostwriting.</p>
<p>God bless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://tatumweb.com/blog/2007/03/31/why-julie-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-62173</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatumweb.com/blog/2007/03/31/why-julie-blogs/#comment-62173</guid>
		<description>:: grin :: Thanks for stopping by, Julie!

I hear you. But, secretly, deep inside, you must be at least a little tickled that someone actually paid attention when reading your post? I know it tickles me when it happens. Come on, admit it. :: LOL ::

I know not a lot of writers seem to talk about the joy of re-reading their own work. I do, all the time, especially when it&#039;s still fresh. And then, later, after some time has passed and I&#039;ve forgotten what I&#039;ve written, I rediscover a post, an old email, or an old forum post and I&#039;m surprised again.

I say surprise, because my writing is, really, a stream-of-consciousness thing. I don&#039;t always know where I&#039;m going to go when I start writing — even the stuff I&#039;ve written for paid publication. I may have a general idea, I may even have a sort of bulleted list of topics I want to address or a conclusion I want to reach, but really, I don&#039;t write from an outline. I don&#039;t do multiple drafts, I don&#039;t do a heavy re-write (except when it&#039;s really called for). I just open a vein and start bleeding.

Later, after the words have dried and left their indelible stain, I rediscover the thing I have created and I&#039;m surprised. I often think, &quot;Gee, &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; wrote that? &lt;i&gt;That&lt;/i&gt; guy was a lot smarter on that day than I am now. How did that happen?&quot; I mean, this happens all the time. Because I learn by writing, I process my thoughts through words. So I am even taught by what I&#039;ve written before and am caught unaware by whatever inspired me.

This is probably what many writers mean when they talk about their &quot;muse.&quot; It&#039;s inspiration, really. Something breathed into us by our unconscious, by the Holy Spirit, or — for those less-fortunate — by other powers perhaps.

I haven&#039;t faced writer&#039;s block yet. My biggest problem is inertia. Once I start writing, though — anything, anything at all — the words come. They just flow. And I get a huge kick out of seeing what comes out.

Anyhow, now I ramble. Thanks, again, for stopping by.

Rich.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://tatumweb.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;BlogRodent&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:: grin :: Thanks for stopping by, Julie!</p>
<p>I hear you. But, secretly, deep inside, you must be at least a little tickled that someone actually paid attention when reading your post? I know it tickles me when it happens. Come on, admit it. :: LOL ::</p>
<p>I know not a lot of writers seem to talk about the joy of re-reading their own work. I do, all the time, especially when it&#8217;s still fresh. And then, later, after some time has passed and I&#8217;ve forgotten what I&#8217;ve written, I rediscover a post, an old email, or an old forum post and I&#8217;m surprised again.</p>
<p>I say surprise, because my writing is, really, a stream-of-consciousness thing. I don&#8217;t always know where I&#8217;m going to go when I start writing — even the stuff I&#8217;ve written for paid publication. I may have a general idea, I may even have a sort of bulleted list of topics I want to address or a conclusion I want to reach, but really, I don&#8217;t write from an outline. I don&#8217;t do multiple drafts, I don&#8217;t do a heavy re-write (except when it&#8217;s really called for). I just open a vein and start bleeding.</p>
<p>Later, after the words have dried and left their indelible stain, I rediscover the thing I have created and I&#8217;m surprised. I often think, &#8220;Gee, <i>I</i> wrote that? <i>That</i> guy was a lot smarter on that day than I am now. How did that happen?&#8221; I mean, this happens all the time. Because I learn by writing, I process my thoughts through words. So I am even taught by what I&#8217;ve written before and am caught unaware by whatever inspired me.</p>
<p>This is probably what many writers mean when they talk about their &#8220;muse.&#8221; It&#8217;s inspiration, really. Something breathed into us by our unconscious, by the Holy Spirit, or — for those less-fortunate — by other powers perhaps.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t faced writer&#8217;s block yet. My biggest problem is inertia. Once I start writing, though — anything, anything at all — the words come. They just flow. And I get a huge kick out of seeing what comes out.</p>
<p>Anyhow, now I ramble. Thanks, again, for stopping by.</p>
<p>Rich.<br />
<a href="http://tatumweb.com/blog/" rel="tag">BlogRodent</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://tatumweb.com/blog/2007/03/31/why-julie-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-62091</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatumweb.com/blog/2007/03/31/why-julie-blogs/#comment-62091</guid>
		<description>Rich, you have been very kind to me in your column...not sure I deserve that. However, your observations on things writers do (reread their own work, etc.) and the process of writing is right on; at least, I identify with it very much. This post has been fun to read (once I can block mention of me out of it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, you have been very kind to me in your column&#8230;not sure I deserve that. However, your observations on things writers do (reread their own work, etc.) and the process of writing is right on; at least, I identify with it very much. This post has been fun to read (once I can block mention of me out of it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barisax.org</title>
		<link>http://tatumweb.com/blog/2007/03/31/why-julie-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-62959</link>
		<dc:creator>barisax.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatumweb.com/blog/2007/03/31/why-julie-blogs/#comment-62959</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Rich, the Blog Rodent, riffs on blogging and writing. &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="class="technorati-balloon"  ><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a> Rich, the Blog Rodent, riffs on blogging and writing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
