<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are three odd numbers evidence of a Creator?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tatumweb.com/blog/2006/03/10/are-three-odd-numbers-evidence-of-a-creator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tatumweb.com/blog/2006/03/10/are-three-odd-numbers-evidence-of-a-creator/</link>
	<description>Pentecostal Rumination and Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:10:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yesterday's Heretic 3.0: "Myth of beginning - Myth of ending"</title>
		<link>http://tatumweb.com/blog/2006/03/10/are-three-odd-numbers-evidence-of-a-creator/comment-page-1/#comment-57760</link>
		<dc:creator>Yesterday's Heretic 3.0: "Myth of beginning - Myth of ending"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 04:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatumweb.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/10/are-three-odd-numbers-evidence-of-a-creator/#comment-57760</guid>
		<description>&#171;&#160;Here&#039;s an interesting blurb from a blog of a friend of mine. I&#039;m a math moron, but I still found this interesting: &quot;For Darwin&#039;s theory to have a chance of being right, the universe would have to be a trillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion times older than it is. &#8230;&quot;&#160;&#187; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://mikeshelton.livejournal.com/18806.html&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Here&#8217;s an interesting blurb from a blog of a friend of mine. I&#8217;m a math moron, but I still found this interesting: &#8220;For Darwin&#8217;s theory to have a chance of being right, the universe would have to be a trillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion times older than it is. &hellip;&#8221;&nbsp;&raquo; [<a href="http://mikeshelton.livejournal.com/18806.html" rel="tag" class="extlink">more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://tatumweb.com/blog/2006/03/10/are-three-odd-numbers-evidence-of-a-creator/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatumweb.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/10/are-three-odd-numbers-evidence-of-a-creator/#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>Shane, I would nod my head in agreement, except that I would only be pretending not to be a mathematical idiot. And that&#039;s the kind of thing I restrict myself to doing only at office parties and church socials.

:: sigh ::

Rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shane, I would nod my head in agreement, except that I would only be pretending not to be a mathematical idiot. And that&#8217;s the kind of thing I restrict myself to doing only at office parties and church socials.</p>
<p>:: sigh ::</p>
<p>Rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane wilkins</title>
		<link>http://tatumweb.com/blog/2006/03/10/are-three-odd-numbers-evidence-of-a-creator/comment-page-1/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>shane wilkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatumweb.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/10/are-three-odd-numbers-evidence-of-a-creator/#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>rich,
It is Euler&#039;s Identity (which is a special case of Euler&#039;s formula) that equals -1.

It should look like this:

e^(i*pi)+1=0

For the derivation see &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_identity&quot;&gt;the wikipedia article&lt;/a&gt;.

I remember the first time I saw this derivation. It seemed like magic. 

good times, good times.

shane</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rich,<br />
It is Euler&#8217;s Identity (which is a special case of Euler&#8217;s formula) that equals -1.</p>
<p>It should look like this:</p>
<p>e^(i*pi)+1=0</p>
<p>For the derivation see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_identity" class="extlink">the wikipedia article</a>.</p>
<p>I remember the first time I saw this derivation. It seemed like magic. </p>
<p>good times, good times.</p>
<p>shane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
